Variability of Medial and Lateral Borders Delineation in Guidelines for Post-Mastectomy Irradiation and its effect on Radiation Dose Received by Left Lung and Heart

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University.

2 Department of Clinical Oncology, Kasr Al-Ainy Center of Clinical Oncology & Nuclear Medicine, Kasr Al-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University.

10.21608/ejmr.2025.353362.1778

Abstract

Background: Clinical Target Volume (CTV) delineation is an essential step in post-mastectomy irradiation. Due to the anatomical positioning of the affected breast, it is anticipated that the delineation of the lateral margin will impact on the standard tangential fields, consequently affecting the volumes of the ipsilateral lung and heart (on the left side) that are exposed to high doses of radiation. Aim of work: Assessment of impact of different guidelines for chest wall CTV delineation on the doses received by the contralateral breast and left lung, and a comparison with wire-based delineation (WBD) results. Methodology: Following surgery, Chest wall(CW) 3-Dimensional(3D) Conformal radiation was planned for 13 left breast cancer women with T3/4 &/or Nodal +ve. One radiation oncologist's CW delineation was followed by several ESTRO recommendations, along with a 3D WBD of CW beneath the diseased breast based on anatomy.We compared between the 2 plans regarding coverage, homogeneity, radiation dose received by heart, lt lung and contralateral breast. Results: The 2 plans was equal regarding coverage and homogeneity. For heart dose(D50%) in plans based on wire delineation was (89.0 + 9.8 cGy) Vs (121.4 +/-24.5 cGy , p= 0.001) in ESTRO guidelines. The chest wall volume in the plan based on wire was smaller than the ESTRO plan. Regarding lt lung there was a significant difference in V20(15.2 +/- 2.1%) for ESRTO delineation Vs(12.4 +/- 1.8%) for wire based delineation .Conclusion: Using a wire in post modified radical mastectomy irradiation had an effect on radiation dose received by heart, lung and contralateral breast .

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Levitt SH, Purdy JA, Perez CA, Vijayakumar S. Technical basis of radiation therapy: practical clinical applications, 4th revised edition. New York: Springer; 2006.
  2. Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D., Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2016. (2016) CA Cancer J Clin 66(1): 7-30.
  3. Abdulrahman GO, Rahman GA. Epidemiology of breast cancer in Europe and Africa. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;2012:5.
  4. Salhia B, Tapia C, Ishak EA, Gaber S, Berghuis B, Hussain KH, DuQuette RA, Resau J, Carpten J. Molecular subtype analysis determines the association of advanced breast cancer in Egypt with favorable biology. BMC Womens Health. 2011;11:4412
  5. International commission on radiation units and measurements (ICRU) report 50. Prescription, recording and reporting photon beam therapy. Bethesda, MD: ICRU; 1993.
  6. International commission on radiation units and measurements (ICRU) report 62. Prescription, recording and reporting photon beam therapy (supplement t o ICRU report 50). Bethesda, MD: ICRU; 1999.
  7. White J, Tai A, Arthur D, Buchholz T, MacDonald S, Marks L, Pierce L, et al., "Breast Cancer Atlas for Radiation Therapy Planning: Consensus Definitions," Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, 2009.
  8. Offersen BV, Boersma LJ, Kirkove C, Hol S, Aznar MC, Sola AB, et al., "ESTRO consensus guideline on target volume delineation for elective radiation therapy of early stage breast cancer," Radiotherapy and Oncology , no. 114, pp. 3- 10, 2015.
  9. Diane S, Sherry C, Heather T, Satyapal R, Pavel S, John H: Breast radiotherapy with inclusion of internal mammary nodes: a comparison of techniques with 3D planning. INT J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 55:633-644,2003.
  10. Senkus-Konefka E, Jassem J. Complications of breast-cancer radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2006;18(3):229–35.
  11. Lenihan DJ, Esteva FJ. Multidisciplinary strategy for managing cardiovascular risks when treating patients with early breast cancer. Oncologist. 2008;13(12):1224–34.
  12. Fontanilla, H. P., Woodward, W. A., Lindberg, M. E., Kanke, J. E., Arora, G., Durbin, R. R., & Dong, L. (2012). Current clinical coverage of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-defined target volumes for postmastectomy radiation therapy. Practical Radiation Oncology2(3), 201-209.‏
  13. Alsherif, W. A., & Mousa, R. M. (2020). Variability of Medial and Lateral Borders Delineation in Guidelines for Post-Mastectomy Irradiation Significantly Affects Radiation Dose Received by Left Lung and Heart. Tumori Journal106(1_suppl), 10-10.‏
  14. Darby, S. C., Cutter, D. J., Boerma, M., Constine, L. S., Fajardo, L. F., Kodama, K., Shore, R. E. (2010). RADIATION-RELATED HEART DISEEASE: CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND FUTURE PROSPECTS. Intternational Journal Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 656-665.
  15. Lee, T-F., Chao, P-J., Chang, L., Ting, H-M., & Huang, Y-J. (2015). Developing Multivariable Normal Tissue Compilcation Probability Model to Predict the Incidence of Smptomatic Radiation Pneumonitis among Breast Cancer Patients. PLOS ONE, 7(10), 1-17.
  16. Ayata, H. B., Güden, M., Ceylan, C., Kücük, N., & Engin, K. (2011). Comparison of dose distributions and organs at risk (OAR). Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy, 95–102.
  17. Taylor, C., Correa, C., Duane, F. K., Aznar, M. C., Anderson, S. J., Bergh, J., McGale, P. (2017). Estimating the Risks of Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: Evidence From Modern Radiation Doses to the Lungs and Heart and From Previous Randomized Trails. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35(15), 1641-1651.